Difference between revisions of "Words describing sound"

From Jeskola Buzz Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(more sound words....)
(even more)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
|  Thin
 
|  Thin
 
|  Lacking frequencies that are expected
 
|  Lacking frequencies that are expected
 +
|-
 +
|  Muffled
 +
|  Lacking treble, (or sometimes lacking transients)
 +
|-
 +
|  Booming
 +
|  Having too much sound at one single frequency band in the bass or low mids.
 +
|-
 +
|  Clean
 +
|  Lack of noise, not being confusing to listen to in terms of complexity
 +
|-
 +
|  Busy
 +
|  Being too complex, with too many instruments that are hard to tell apart.
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 20:17, 22 September 2009

People often need to describe sound to each other, but the words for such descriptions are not well defined, unscientific, and can vary from person to person. This is a rather futile attempt to list and describe them.

Sound word What it really means to a sound technician
Bass Low frequencies
Treble High frequencies
Warm More bass and low mids, less treble
Cold Less bass and low mids, more treble
Aggressive Resemblance with white noise, lots of (dis)harmonics
Digital Unclear yet over-emphasized treble, such as the one caused by poor resampling or aliasing
Fat / phat Pleasing, using a frequency area at least as wide as hoped for
Thin Lacking frequencies that are expected
Muffled Lacking treble, (or sometimes lacking transients)
Booming Having too much sound at one single frequency band in the bass or low mids.
Clean Lack of noise, not being confusing to listen to in terms of complexity
Busy Being too complex, with too many instruments that are hard to tell apart.